Alliance Registration for Multi-Sensory Structured Language Education (MSLE) Practice Exam

Question: 1 / 730

In Chall's reading Stage 4, how does reading comprehension compare to listening comprehension for difficult materials?

Reading comprehension is much less effective

Listening comprehension is more effective

Reading comprehension is equal or better

In Chall's reading Stage 4, also known as the "Reading for Learning" stage, learners are typically able to engage with complex texts and integrate information across various sources. At this stage, reading comprehension tends to equal or surpass listening comprehension when dealing with difficult materials. This is largely due to the enhanced ability of readers to process written information, where they can go back and reread challenging passages, take notes, and annotate, which allows for deeper understanding and analysis.

Unlike listening comprehension, which is often limited to a single instance of auditory input, reading empowers learners to interact with the text at their own pace. They can pause to reflect, clarify confusing concepts, and engage more thoroughly with the content. This stage of reading development reflects a higher level of cognitive engagement and critical thinking, which is essential for the synthesis of information and independent learning. Therefore, the assertion that reading comprehension is equal or better highlights the advantages that proficient readers possess when tackling complex materials compared to listeners.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

Both are equally ineffective

Next Question

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy